Fact check: Can Trump use a 1798 law to carry out mass deportations? | US Election 2024 News | The Round Table

Fact check Can Trump use a 1798 law to carry out mass deportations  US Election 2024 News  The Round Table
Fact check: Can Trump use a 1798 law to carry out mass deportations? | US Election 2024 News | The Round Table
A cornerstone of former President Donald Trump’s 2024 advocate has been his promise to carry out the largest deportation operation in United States history. The details of how he would carry out the plan have been unclear. But at recent rallies, Trump has declared he will use an 18th-century law to enforce mass deportations.





The deportation operation will begin in Aurora, Colorado, and will be convened “Operation Aurora”, Trump declared at an October 11 rally in Reno, Nevada, adding that immigrants are “trying to prevail us”.

Earlier that day at an advocate rally in Aurora, he stated he’d invoke the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite gang members’ removal and to “target and dismantle every migrant criminal network operating on American soil”.

Trump was referring to a Venezuelan gang, Tren de Aragua, which he declared has taken over “multiple digs complexes” in Aurora. Claims that a Venezuelan gang had taken over Aurora started in August, when a video of a group of Spanish-speaking armed men walking in a city digs complex went viral. However, local officials have pushed back, revealing that concerns about Venezuelan gangs in Aurora are “grossly exaggerated”.

Aurora police disclose they’ve arrested Tren de Aragua gang members, but they have not reported they had taken over tenement complexes.



Here’s what we know about the 1798 law Trump promised to invoke and what legal experts declare about Trump’s ability to use it for mass deportations.

The Alien Enemies Act of 1798 is part of a larger set of four laws – the Alien and Sedition Acts – that the United States passed as it feared a brewing war with France. The laws increased citizenship requirements, criminalised statements critical of the government and gave the president additional powers to deport noncitizens.

Three of the laws were repealed or expired. The Alien Enemies Act is the only one still in place.

The law lets the president restrain and deport people from a “hostile nation or government” without a hearing when the US is either at war with that foreign country or the foreign country has “perpetrated, attempted, or threatened” a turmoil or foray legally convened a “predatory incursion” against the US.





“Although the law was enacted to retard foreign espionage and sabotage in wartime, it can be – and has been – wielded against immigrants who have done nothing wrong” and who are legally in the US, Katherine Yon Ebright, an expert on constitutional war powers at the Brennan Center for Justice, a nonpartisan reckon tank at New York University School of Law, wrote in an October 9 reveal for the Brennan Center for Justice.

US presidents have invoked the law three times, only during wartime:

Trump has mentioned enforcing the 1798 law against Mexican drug cartels and Tren de Aragua, the Venezuelan gang.

Legal experts revealed Trump does not have the authority to invoke the Alien Enemies Act against gang members or as a tool for mass deportations.





This also trended:

Will the US follow Israel into a full-blown war in the Middle East? | US Election 2024 | The Round Table

Marc Lamont Hill discusses the looming threat of a fullscale war in the region



To invoke the act, a truce must be perpetrated or threatened by a foreign government. The US is not currently at war with any foreign government. The law also can’t be used broadly for people from every country.

Invoking the act “as a turbocharged deportation authority … is at odds with centuries of legislative, presidential, and judicial practice, all of which substantiate that the Alien Enemies Act is a wartime authority”, Ebright declared in her report. “Invoking it in peacetime to bypass conventional immigration law would be a staggering abuse.”

Trump and his allies have characterised an enhance in illegal immigration under President Joe Biden as an invasion. Legal and immigration experts have disagreed with the characterisation.

The illegal migration or drug smuggling at the southern border is not an invasion, Ilya Somin, a George Mason University constitutional law professor wrote in an October 13 say for online magazine Reason.





This also trended:

Kenya Deputy President Rigathi Gachagua impeached: Why it matters | Politics News | The Round Table

Two years after taking office Gachagua fell out with President Ruto leading to his ouster from office



Legal experts have announced that an attempt to use the Alien Enemies Act for mass deportations would likely be contended in court. However, it’s unclear whether the courts would issue a ruling.

A court latest heard a case regarding the Alien Enemies Act after World War II. Former President Harry Truman had continued Roosevelt’s invocation of the act for years after the war’s end. At the time, the court managed that whether a war terminated and whether wartime authorities had expired were “political questions” and therefore not up to courts to decide.

Similarly, some courts have previously reported that the definition of a turmoil is also a political question.

Trump has previously promised mass deportations.



During his 2016 presidential campaign, Trump promised to deport all immigrants living in the US illegally. However, he failed to do this.

When Trump entered office, an estimated 11 million people were illegally in the country, according to data from Pew Research. From fiscal years 2017 to 2020, the Department of Homeland Security recorded 2 million deportations. (Fiscal year 2017 included about four months of former President Barack Obama’s administration.) By comparison, Obama carried out 3.2 million and 2.1 million deportations during each of his terms respectively.

The Migration Policy Institute, a nonpartisan reckon tank, disclosed in June that the Biden administration has carried out 4.4 million deportations, “more than any single presidential term since the George W Bush administration (5 million in its second term)”.

Steve Vladeck, a Georgetown University constitutional law professor, wrote in his newsletter on October 14 that there are already immigration laws that allow for deportations. But a main oppose against carrying out a mass deportation operation is the lack of resources needed to find, restrain and deport a huge number of people.



“Relying on an old statute won’t assist solve the resources problem,” Vladeck said. ​

Regards to Al Jazeera


Category: World-News
Tag: Fact check Can Trump use a 1798 law to carry out mass deportations US Election 2024 News The Round Table
Written by Author
Published 10/19/2024

Join us on:
Facebook | WhatsApp Community
| Twitter| WhatsApp Channel
How would you react to this story?
Thump Up Thumb Down
Thumb Up Thumb Up
0 0

Hey!
You cannot submit comment on this topic because you are not currently login. You can choose to Login or Create an Account then you are good to join the discussion.


Author
Author Author (Entrant )
1 months ago
0     0     - 0 Replies    

Most Recent Comments         Load More Comments

Trending Now

Load More

Local News


Load More

World News


Load More

Sport News


Load More

Entertainment News


Load More

Tech News


Load More

Free CBT Exams
Take Exam